Archive for February, 2007

Success Story: Farming and the Environment

Wednesday, February 28th, 2007
We just published a success story about a great group, Farming and the Environment that gives some insight into the kind of work we do at ONE/Northwest. F+E is a 2 person nonprofit using website, email communications, and Salesforce.com to manage their mission. The success story covers all their engagement work, and the technology involved.

The mention of the Salesforce.com project isn’t very detailed, so I’ll embellish a bit here:

  • we’re tracking their farmer’s market using campaigns and opportunities
    • tracking all registered vendors
    • tracking weekly commission on gross sales (F+E’s admin fee for having the market)
  • we’re tracking relationships between farmers and buyers (restaurants, markets, institutions) with a Custom Object called Sales Agreement
    • Sales Agreements tie food producers with buyers so F+E can see the landscape of interconnectedness
  • we’re tracking sustainable farming statistics via Accounts and a Custom Object called Acreage
    • how many acres of land are under sustainable farming certifications?
    • how do those acreages change over time?
    • has a farm gone
      through the F+E qualification process?
  • we’re integrated with their email blasting tool (What Counts)
    • signups are via Web-to-Lead
    • Contacts that have newsletter checkboxes selected are automatically pulled over to What Counts for delivery
It was a fun project where we focused on the minimum data they needed to get their work done (they are a two person org…) F+E is very happy with the system and use it heavily to manage their work.

Looking to expand

Tuesday, February 27th, 2007

Last Tuesday as I sent out 6 proposals for Salesforce.com projects, I realized that I needed to ramp up the effort to hire someone to help out. I’m looking for someone just like me–independent, analytical, technical, with a desire to help environmental nonprofits use the best CRM available to them. Flexibility, willingness to learn, and collaborative spirit are key to being successful in this job.

ONE/Northwest is a great place to work, my best job ever. My colleagues are truly brilliant people. Because of that, we are a very flat organization–I’m not so much looking for someone to work for me, but with me. I want these kinds of skills to help us build our program beyond the 10 implementations we’ve done to date. We’re going to be very focused on meeting the needs of the small environmental groups as well and looking at sharing data between groups, as well as sharing data up to coalition efforts. The voter file is an interesting data set that we’ll be working with extensively this year. We’re doing some cutting edge work, things Salesforce.com hasn’t ever done before. It’s really fun.

ONE/Northwest is a great place to work. Salesforce.com is an amazing platform to work on. The Northwest (and Southwest Canadian) environmental movement is a movement that is winning and making change. And because Salesforce.com is web-based, I’m happy to consider remote office arrangements. The only drawback to all of this is you would have to work with me. Drop me a line if you want to chat: Steve @ this site’s url.

The official job announcement and description will come out in the next month or so, and of course I’ll post it here.

Process Modeling for the Masses

Tuesday, February 27th, 2007

Ismael has some comments on the recent announcement of web-based Business Process Modeling tools. He’s pretty down on the concept, wondering why folks would prefer applications like Lombardi Blueprint to a full suite like IDS Scheer ARIS or a completely flexible tool like Visio.

I think there is a huge need for Blueprint-like services. In my work consulting with nonprofits around their business processes, I’ve come to realize that most of them have never systematically analyzed how they work. They’ve never taken the time to lay out their work processes, who’s doing them, and what problems there might be along the way. These groups are very busy, generally have no technical staff, and pay sub-standard salaries. It’s very understandable that they haven’t taken a systematic look at their work.

But, they are often very high functioning, and once they are exposed to process modeling they “get it”. A number of folks I’ve shown my process models to have taken on the mantle of process mapper for their org, and are spreading the religion. It’s been really fun to watch.

Tools like Blueprint will make process modeling more accessible to small businesses, like nonprofits. We’ll never need a process modeling suite–what we’re doing is not that complex. Viso works, but there are no process modeling best practices built into Visio, other than the concept of functional swim lanes.

Blueprint-like services have lots of best practices built in. The concepts of business owners, participants, problems, and sub-processes are all hard-coded into the service. This level of structure is the right level for the millions of folks out there who should be thinking about their work in a systematic way, but have no idea what BPM, ESB, and BPEL mean.

So hurray for business process modeling “lite” and vendors like Lombardi who are removing hurdles from broader uptake. Systematic analysis can be decoupled from programmatic expression of business processes, and in the small business world, it should be.

links for 2007-02-27

Tuesday, February 27th, 2007

Afternoon

Monday, February 19th, 2007

DSC_0317.JPG

links for 2007-02-17

Saturday, February 17th, 2007

Laura Quinn on Integrating Constituent Data

Friday, February 16th, 2007

Laura, who always produces very thoughtful pieces, has a great article up about constituent data and integration.

It can sound complicated, but it’s a straightforward concept: integrating your constituent data means connecting the information from the various systems you use to communicate with and track your consituents so that your organization can see a unified view.

She lays out 3 main approaches: doing Excel import/exports, buying a all-in-one system, and adding integrations to you core constituent system.

I think Laura does an excellent job talking about the pros and cons of each option. I recommend giving the article a read if you’re thinking of revamping your constituent systems.

Try to get your head around what will be possible with Apex

Friday, February 16th, 2007

Take a look at this video from the fabulous folks at CRMFusion. It’s a preview of a product they’re writing to warn you of duplicate data right when you try to create that data. It’s really amazing.

We’re going to have to get our heads around some new things when Apex launches in 2007. Like being able to plug 3rd-party business logic widgets into the application. In this case, we’re plugging CRMFusion’s dupe check widget in right before the save event. We build the logic in Salesforce.com, that logic is then referenced by the widget on attempted record save, and our business process is enforced.

This is amazing, really. The possibilities are exploding exponentially, as you would expect as Salesforce.com turns it’s application into a web-aware, application development platform. Wow.

Ismael on the power of a CRM platform

Thursday, February 15th, 2007

Deep thinker Ismael Ghalimi has done insanely detailed adn thoughtful analysis of the Office 2.0 landscape. At the center of it all is CRM, and a while back he migrated from Salesforce.com to SugarCRM. Now he’s migrated back, and I whole heartedly agree with his reasoning.

Any good Office 2.0 setup, be it mine or yours, needs a focal point, a place where all the bits and pieces fall into place. And because no single solution will address all the requirements you might have, what you really need is a platform that can integrate multiple applications in a meaningful way…Salesforce.com has matured into a full-fledged platform, and it has become too difficult to ignore its appeal.

What I’ve learned about donor management

Thursday, February 15th, 2007

I’ve been helping nonprofits build databases for over a year now. I’ve worked with about 10 orgs of various sizes–the largest being about 20 staff. A big part of my work is mapping out how these groups do fund development. Tracking donors, members, grants, and payments is a big part of what all nonprofits do. I sit down with each org and talk about how they raise money, so that I can understand the work in enough detail to be sure the database I build will support them in that work.

Turns out, these groups raise money in pretty similar ways. What I’d like to share today is some process maps that describe donor management at these orgs. We’ll start with two maps that focus on taking a new donor prospect through the ask process. There are many other processes that go into managing donors, but we’ll start here.

These process maps aren’t about technology at all–they’re about work and how it gets done. We’re creating a snapshot of how orgs work, and who does that work. It’s not about Salesforce.com, or even about databases. All this work could be supported by post it notes and phone calls. Taking the technology out of the picture gets us to focus on the work, which is the real point.

OK, now some vocabulary about process maps. Circle is the starting point, rectangles are things that happen, diamonds are where decisions need to be made, rectangles with a wavy bottom are documents that fit into the process, and the last shape on this first page is a link to another page. Arrows show you the direction of the flow, which is generally left to right.

Activities are put in a “lane” for the person who is responsible for that work. On these maps you’ll see lanes for Donor Management and Solicitor–if things are happening in their lanes, those folks are the ones doing that work.

So let’s look at our first process map:

process_new_donor_sm.png

Fig 1. Process map taking a new donor prospect through the steps necessary to move them to an ask for money (PDF)

This first map (Fig. 1) starts with a new donor prospect dropping in our lap. We then bring in an outside solicitor (i.e. board member) if that makes sense. Some initial communications brief the prospect as much as necessary, leaning on key collateral that already exists. We can have as many informational touches as necessary before we hit the end of this map and head off to the ask, which is on the next page.

process_new_donor_ask_sm.png

Fig. 2. Process map taking a new donor prospect through the ask process, getting them to a yes/no decision (PDF)

We start where we come in from the previous page. You’ll see that most of the activities in the ask process are in the center lane, which is whomever is leading the donation, either donor management staff or a solicitor. Sometimes the ask occurred early on (like if the prospect is the ED’s sister) otherwise we create a team of folks for the ask meeting, brief them, have the meeting, and thank the prospect. Then we act on the donation if they’ve pledged by recording it and looking into corporate matching opportunities. If they didn’t commit, did they say no or do they just need more info? We can have more meetings to get to a yes or a no. Then we’re done!

Checks sometimes are written at the ask meeting, but sometimes not. The next process in the flow deals with handling donations as they come in. I’ll post that process in the future and take us through processing donations and thanking the donors.

The rest of the series: