links for 2006-12-21

One Response to “links for 2006-12-21”

  1. Judi Sohn Says:

    Hi Steve, you may have missed the follow-up response from Cingular. It seems that the good orange folks are sayiing that the TOS clause is excused because it’s based on a service you subscribe to. SMS pay-per-use is there by default, not a subscription, so apparently Cingular can do whatever they want with the rates. In fact, this is likely a way of forcing folks like me who get/receive maybe 20 texts a month to go for a plan. I couldn’t see the logic in paying $4.99 a month for something that I pay an average of $2-3 a month a-la-carte.

Leave a Reply